1 d

In today’s highly competit?

r/fidelityinvestments. ?

VXUS offers some diversification effect, correlation with VTI is 76% and VOO is 63%. This choice might be more nuanced if VEU were cheaper than VXUS, but they cost the same 0 VT vs VTI+VXUS. I can’t see myself actually taking advantage of tax loss harvesting or anything like that in the short term. For what it's worth I hold VT in my Roth IRA and VTI + VXUS in my taxable account. nbcrnbtjox You lose access to the foreign tax credit. #ETFs have become so popular that the money invested in ETFs has gone up by 3,000% since 2003. 07%, while an equivalent VTI/VXUS portfolio has an expense ratio of about 0That's a savings of $25/$100k per year. JoMoney Posts: 16260 Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 10:31 am. Regular maintenance and servicing are crucial to ensure the longevi. ellie james onlyfans leaks VT has an expense ratio of 0 In the past year, VT returned a total of 18. VTI, VOO and VT Of those 3, I wouldn't use VOO at all. Pennsylvania is known for its vibrant and diverse festivals that showcase the state’s rich culture, history, and traditions. So not much, but larger than the difference in expense ratios. Possibly consider VWO (emerging markets) and VEA (developed) held separately in place of VXUS, if you want finer control of foreign. safeway menu sandwiches Assuming a market weight equity portfolio, if you hold VTSAX+VXUS instead of VT then 40% of your equity would be VXUS, so the value of the FTC would be 023 * 40%) or greater than the entire expense ratio. ….

Post Opinion